Chreece
Tried to physically delete a song that was already loaded on deck 1, the pop up that warns me that the file is still in use comes up, minimize it, unload the song, minimize the vdj 8, and when i clicked the VDJ 8 shortcut on the taskbar that was already active the pop up comes out to retry to delete the file and the program doesn't come up, terminated the process and restarted the program...
geposted Thu 11 Sep 14 @ 12:05 pm
ErikVeejay
With the NS7II & Mac , a motorized platter turned on the sampler Instrumens is corrupted by the engines activated
in camp no
in camp no
geposted Thu 11 Sep 14 @ 2:25 pm
dcomo
Why is this build still available for the Mac if it crashes on start? (I would have expected it to be pulled hours ago.)
geposted Thu 11 Sep 14 @ 4:28 pm
Mr_T
Crash on MAC
Process: VirtualDJ [9805]
Path: /Applications/VirtualDJ 8.app/Contents/MacOS/VirtualDJ
Identifier: com.atomixproductions.virtualdj
Version: ???
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [178]
Responsible: VirtualDJ [9805]
User ID: 501
Date/Time: 2014-09-12 01:47:30.910 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)
Report Version: 11
Anonymous UUID: C53CB5EF-8345-E9ED-E881-CA391B51D41D
Sleep/Wake UUID: 0A2E9D6B-A435-42A9-B832-8B72E7F7E8CF
Crashed Thread: 0
--------------
there isn´t a crash Report "0"
Process: VirtualDJ [9805]
Path: /Applications/VirtualDJ 8.app/Contents/MacOS/VirtualDJ
Identifier: com.atomixproductions.virtualdj
Version: ???
Code Type: X86-64 (Native)
Parent Process: launchd [178]
Responsible: VirtualDJ [9805]
User ID: 501
Date/Time: 2014-09-12 01:47:30.910 +0200
OS Version: Mac OS X 10.9.4 (13E28)
Report Version: 11
Anonymous UUID: C53CB5EF-8345-E9ED-E881-CA391B51D41D
Sleep/Wake UUID: 0A2E9D6B-A435-42A9-B832-8B72E7F7E8CF
Crashed Thread: 0
--------------
there isn´t a crash Report "0"
geposted Thu 11 Sep 14 @ 6:49 pm
Stephane Clavel
Dj Sky-Trendsetters wrote :
Still testing to see what could be a reason for my increase in CPU, i'll revert to build 1932 to see if the issue remains the same but so far no issues with drift, smart mode isn't that accurate and will sometimes lose cue positions on CDJs but I suppose that's not a big issue, just need to narrow down what's causing the demand for more CPU on my PC. Thanks
Dj Sky-Trendsetters wrote :
Regression bug: This update is killing my CPU using time codes, my i7 is struggling to do tasks it used to handle like butter and i'm hitting red constantly. Please optimize the code
Latency at 10ms
sample rate 44100
Latency at 10ms
sample rate 44100
Still testing to see what could be a reason for my increase in CPU, i'll revert to build 1932 to see if the issue remains the same but so far no issues with drift, smart mode isn't that accurate and will sometimes lose cue positions on CDJs but I suppose that's not a big issue, just need to narrow down what's causing the demand for more CPU on my PC. Thanks
Do you have a high CPU usage only when you are using timecode, or also without timecodes?
If only with timecode, do you still have a high CPU if you select "virtualdj timecode" in the timecode config (even if you dont have one)?
Do you have high CPU only when a song is playing, or also when it's paused?
geposted Fri 12 Sep 14 @ 4:01 am
ErikVeejay
dcomo wrote :
Why is this build still available for the Mac if it crashes on start? (I would have expected it to be pulled hours ago.)
I have macbook pro 2012, 2.3GHz i7 - 8Gb 1600Mhz GT650M 512Mb Os 10.8.5
no crash at startup of this Build
geposted Fri 12 Sep 14 @ 4:46 am
Dj Sky-Trendsetters
sclavel wrote :
Do you have a high CPU usage only when you are using timecode, or also without timecodes?
If only with timecode, do you still have a high CPU if you select "virtualdj timecode" in the timecode config (even if you dont have one)?
Do you have high CPU only when a song is playing, or also when it's paused?
Dj Sky-Trendsetters wrote :
Still testing to see what could be a reason for my increase in CPU, i'll revert to build 1932 to see if the issue remains the same but so far no issues with drift, smart mode isn't that accurate and will sometimes lose cue positions on CDJs but I suppose that's not a big issue, just need to narrow down what's causing the demand for more CPU on my PC. Thanks
Dj Sky-Trendsetters wrote :
Regression bug: This update is killing my CPU using time codes, my i7 is struggling to do tasks it used to handle like butter and i'm hitting red constantly. Please optimize the code
Latency at 10ms
sample rate 44100
Latency at 10ms
sample rate 44100
Still testing to see what could be a reason for my increase in CPU, i'll revert to build 1932 to see if the issue remains the same but so far no issues with drift, smart mode isn't that accurate and will sometimes lose cue positions on CDJs but I suppose that's not a big issue, just need to narrow down what's causing the demand for more CPU on my PC. Thanks
Do you have a high CPU usage only when you are using timecode, or also without timecodes?
If only with timecode, do you still have a high CPU if you select "virtualdj timecode" in the timecode config (even if you dont have one)?
Do you have high CPU only when a song is playing, or also when it's paused?
Wouldn't really regard the CPU usage as a bug, I did a gig last night with this build and it worked and responded very well. CPU kept low
geposted Fri 12 Sep 14 @ 6:46 am