atomix_kerozen02
Support for newer file formats please??? WMA is more of a pain in the ass but mp3PRO a definite must...
-djunify
-djunify
geposted Tue 28 May 02 @ 4:42 pm
Dj T-Bone
mp3pro sucks too mann ... not even close to cd quality ... and it eats your cpu ...
greetz
greetz
geposted Tue 28 May 02 @ 6:53 pm
Tommy_2Tall
Seriously.. how can someone claim that MP3PRO is better than normal MP3?
Did someone steal both their brains AND their ears???
We've had this discussion too many times: MP3PRO is SHITE!
It has a very low bitrate and is basically just MP3's destructively compressed to fit on a thumbdrive, compact flash or whatever...the quality sucks since it's focused on size..
Dont believe me?
Check these posts then and get the facts straightened out before you claim that we "must" have mp3pro-support.. it would be a giant leap in the wrong direction:
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=4&topic=887
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=3&topic=6890
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=3&topic=7627
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=4&topic=1241
Nuff said?
I hope so.. 'cause this whole MP3pro-bullsh*t is getting annoying.
Did someone steal both their brains AND their ears???
We've had this discussion too many times: MP3PRO is SHITE!
It has a very low bitrate and is basically just MP3's destructively compressed to fit on a thumbdrive, compact flash or whatever...the quality sucks since it's focused on size..
Dont believe me?
Check these posts then and get the facts straightened out before you claim that we "must" have mp3pro-support.. it would be a giant leap in the wrong direction:
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=4&topic=887
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=3&topic=6890
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=3&topic=7627
http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=4&topic=1241
Nuff said?
I hope so.. 'cause this whole MP3pro-bullsh*t is getting annoying.
geposted Wed 29 May 02 @ 9:12 am
jannick
Sorry guys.....
Think that you need to make a little calculation..... double the bitrate and than lower it with 32 kb/s.
So if you are using a 64 kb/s you will get a quality equal or in this example even better than 96 kb/s.
I think the quality is even comparable to 112 kb/s.
But now over to the maximum bitrate that mp3pro supports so far.... 160 kb/s (this can only be archieved by using Steinberg MyMP3Pro v.3.0)
A calculation off 160 x 2 - 32 comes up with a soundquality comparable with 288 kb/s.
I think it's great to have such good quality and than get such low filesizes...... Right now you can even get more files on your big harddisk :-))
Think that you need to make a little calculation..... double the bitrate and than lower it with 32 kb/s.
So if you are using a 64 kb/s you will get a quality equal or in this example even better than 96 kb/s.
I think the quality is even comparable to 112 kb/s.
But now over to the maximum bitrate that mp3pro supports so far.... 160 kb/s (this can only be archieved by using Steinberg MyMP3Pro v.3.0)
A calculation off 160 x 2 - 32 comes up with a soundquality comparable with 288 kb/s.
I think it's great to have such good quality and than get such low filesizes...... Right now you can even get more files on your big harddisk :-))
geposted Sun 16 Jun 02 @ 11:48 am