yep, just as the subj. says
atomix for me is a right memory hog, ive quitted all of my background apps and it still hogs
i have 96mb of ram and 233mhz p2
i just want atomixmp3 to not hog my system as much :)
atomix for me is a right memory hog, ive quitted all of my background apps and it still hogs
i have 96mb of ram and 233mhz p2
i just want atomixmp3 to not hog my system as much :)
geposted Tue 30 Jul 02 @ 11:33 pm
DJ Rick
You might want to spend some quality time at your local computer store. I hate to suggest that your current machine will have a lot of trouble with many programs that are less than a year or 2 old.
geposted Wed 31 Jul 02 @ 1:26 am
Tommy_2Tall
I agree with Impressions':
I had more RAM than that in my 486DX-system which ran at a mind-boggling 66Mhz... about ten years ago!
It's harsch but it's the truth: you have to upgrade your system... newer versions of Windows have a recommmended minimum of 128 Mb RAM just to get a good performance out of your system.
I had more RAM than that in my 486DX-system which ran at a mind-boggling 66Mhz... about ten years ago!
It's harsch but it's the truth: you have to upgrade your system... newer versions of Windows have a recommmended minimum of 128 Mb RAM just to get a good performance out of your system.
geposted Tue 06 Aug 02 @ 2:50 pm