I'm about to order some M44-7s on technic headshells. Are those good for TCV?
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 1:30 pm
There good, mate had some on his numarks, read somewhere, there are the best bang for your money.
I've got these on my 1210 mk2's
http://www.decks.co.uk/products/carts_styli/stanton/discmaster_v3
Good for the price. If you a scatch DJ don't know how they will stand up, but I just mix house/electro and they have done me well.
Jimmy b
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 2:22 pm

<3 <3 :D Ortofon Concorde Pro, never let me down. :)
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 4:52 pm
The M44's are Scratch DJ standards. I have them on the same turntable and I do scratch. I would tell you be careful of the flip down guard that is mounted to them. I bent the stylii with and had to replace one after two weeks. Nothing wrong with Ortofons either, for that matter Stanton's aren't bad. It sort of depends on what you're doing with them. You can search these forums, I asked this same question some time ago and had a bunch of responses.
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 4:53 pm
It will be for scratching. I remember somewhere reading that certain needles are better because of the backspin effect. Like when you backspin the record, and the music has an indesired effect.
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 5:21 pm
@VanStino
Them Ortofon, look really nice, I bet they play well. Abit out of my prices range though.
Jimmy b
Them Ortofon, look really nice, I bet they play well. Abit out of my prices range though.
Jimmy b
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 5:38 pm
My favorite and the ones that I use :: The Ortofon Q-Berts :: They stick to the record like glue (without alot of weight), have a very high output, and look fresh as f**k. They are a bit pricey but they come with an extra stylus, a case, and a brush.
Second ones which seem to be the standard everywhere. :: Shure M-447's :: People swear by them but they don't fell as smooth and light as the Q-Berts to me.
Hope my input helps,
Charlie Five
Second ones which seem to be the standard everywhere. :: Shure M-447's :: People swear by them but they don't fell as smooth and light as the Q-Berts to me.
Hope my input helps,
Charlie Five
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 5:40 pm
digi tracks :) take it from the guy who designed the VDJ tcvs these or the qberts are your best bet.
http://f3c.yahoofs.com/shopping/mcid7_248385/simg_t_torcoditrtwdjdjmazter_1959_7855968785%3Frm_____DL_xv_tbB" border="0">
geposted Thu 13 Dec 07 @ 7:22 pm
Yeah I had the Digi's than returned them for the Q-Bert's. The Q-Bert's have a higher output and seem to stick better. I think they have a better mid range and warmer sound also. This is with extensive testing. I was a strong believer in the Digi's until a friend made me try them side to side with the Q-Bert's.
geposted Fri 14 Dec 07 @ 12:35 am
Have a pare of digitracks also... these are way better then anything else i tried except for the qberts... i am actually switching to qberts soon.. shure's are fine btw i use them at my residence club... Dont forget that 90% of the whole needle story is setting them up correctly, any brand of needle..
geposted Fri 14 Dec 07 @ 1:21 am
I'm a QBert user as well...top notch :)
I actually use the OM version(with headshell) but they work perfectly!
I actually use the OM version(with headshell) but they work perfectly!
geposted Fri 14 Dec 07 @ 6:42 am
i've got a pair of shure white label ,they are fantastic for club mixing and have been specifically designed for TCV's, check em out, i've read only good reviews about them and can only promote them more myself
geposted Thu 20 Dec 07 @ 3:54 am
i have shure whitelabels as well. been through my second set since they came out 3 years ago. well balanced but a bit bright sounding.
though, i highly doubt whether tcvs need a specific cartridge set or not, we have left the audiophile argument. its whether or not you scratch and what are you comfortable with?
though, i highly doubt whether tcvs need a specific cartridge set or not, we have left the audiophile argument. its whether or not you scratch and what are you comfortable with?
geposted Thu 20 Dec 07 @ 4:42 am
Agree, but i am moving to the qberts from the digitracks becuase of the higher output and slightly better scratch performance. but like i said before 90% of the issues are not the needles but the setup... boy oi boy how many times i have seen bad setup needles and the dj complaining about bad performance... or worse blaming the needles when they have a some bad technics copy turntable...
geposted Thu 20 Dec 07 @ 8:19 pm
Very very true... Here is an article i wrote for a magazine here in Dubai quite some time ago (actually wrote it a few years back)
about setting up tonearm weights, etc.
http://www.djpaz.net/index.php/Infusion-Magazine/Mixing-104.html
about setting up tonearm weights, etc.
http://www.djpaz.net/index.php/Infusion-Magazine/Mixing-104.html
geposted Fri 21 Dec 07 @ 12:04 am
Well moved from digitrack to qberts.. and the funny thing is that i think the pickup is a little less good then with the digitracks.. but since my tcv is not working like it should ill come back on this...
Pickup now:
1) Shure 447
2) Orto Digi's
3) Orto Qberts
Who would have guessed that, anyway need help first with my backwards (reverse) tracking first, since i cant even backspin atm (see other post)... scratching is fine..
Hey nice art Paz, can you update it for the 1210M5G's it has downforce adjustment now 2, awsum.;). you cant get them to skip, i am really trying...
Pickup now:
1) Shure 447
2) Orto Digi's
3) Orto Qberts
Who would have guessed that, anyway need help first with my backwards (reverse) tracking first, since i cant even backspin atm (see other post)... scratching is fine..
Hey nice art Paz, can you update it for the 1210M5G's it has downforce adjustment now 2, awsum.;). you cant get them to skip, i am really trying...
geposted Wed 09 Jan 08 @ 2:06 am