Anmelden:     


Forum: General Discussion

Topic: VDJ Inaccurate BPM

Dieses Thema ist veraltet und kann veraltete oder falsche Informationen enthalten.

So the problem is that VDJ seems to scan my trance songs BPMs a bit weird, since the range of my trance tracks are scattered all the way from 68-185 BPM.

An example of this is that all versions I've tried currently scan Orjan Nilsen - Be As One (La Guitarra) track to 86 Bpm and Orjan Nilsen - La Guitarra is scanned as 135.7bpm. These two tracks I remember sometime was scanned as 130bpm cause I used to mix them with each other creating my own mixes.

At some point i remember that the 5.2.2 LE version gave me the correct bpms of all my tracks and my trance collection was from 120-137bpm which now is scattered as described above. Has anyone any solutions to this? Or atleast ideas of what could be causing this problem.

And please DO NOT suggest i should manually tap or edit the BPM for all my songs! VDJ has previously accomplished scanning the BPMs as correct and that is what I want for now again.

Currently using 5.2.2 LE MAC on a MacBook Pro
 

geposted Mon 19 Apr 10 @ 3:51 pm
I would try to disable \'Allow BPM<80\' option.

 

Sorry but no luck there, had also tried it before and now i tried it again.
For you wondering i have both 5.2.2 LE installed and 6.0.7 Trial. And the bpms were scanned wrong even when I only had just one of them installed
 

Solved!

The problem I think was solved by in OS X changing in energy saver settings in graphics mode from battery to high performance.
For those of you who doesn't know the unibody macbooks have 2 graphic adapters, one low end integrated with processor for battery life and one separate for high performance settings.
The logic is that it is not that the graphics gets faster but the processor doesn't have the burden anymore to carry both processing and graphics, hence giving me correct BPMs on my tracks again
 

Wow? That's the most weird answer/solution I would ever expect in such a problem!

Don't get me wrong, I'm not a windows lover nor a mac hater, but in such a case I will never think again to buy a mac!!!
 

Gotta agree, I do prefer mac computers in the usual things i do (graphics, web design (as a hobby) etc.) but the virtual dj for mac i feel like is quite bad. Seems odd since i use to think that almost everything in the music business runs on macs (what i've seen on youtube on interviews and studios from known artists). But for virtual dj the pc version rocks
 



(Alte Themen und Foren werden automatisch geschlossen)