It Will be run on a pentium 3 550Mhz, 256 ram, 15 Hd, 2 sound card and 1 matrox 4 Mb?
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 11:10 am
aknit44
What?
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 1:48 pm
vlk72
Which OS ??? Possibly upgrade the 550mhz to 1 ghz CPU
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 3:16 pm
Phenryll
It's all right. The trial runs only with one sound card.
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 3:41 pm
Radio Vechtetal
well i've tested it on a PIII 450 with 256 RAM and it runs without any skipping. But my matrox have 32 MB Ram (G400).
Maybe you should buy a newer Videocard with more memory.
greetz,
Janosch
Maybe you should buy a newer Videocard with more memory.
greetz,
Janosch
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 3:45 pm
Thanks... What are the minimun sistem requirements?
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 8:08 pm
Phenryll
with 2.1, I think pII 350-400 + 128 ram, it's strictly minimum, with an OS which not heavy (w98). Don't choice NT engine if this configuration is yours.
Users, what do you think about this?
Users, what do you think about this?
geposted Mon 17 Jun 02 @ 11:10 pm
im running on a p2 350mhz 64mb ram system..
----------------------
www.ghettoblaster.tk
----------------------
www.ghettoblaster.tk
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 1:11 am
DJ Jim
I'm running a
AMD K6 500
128 Meg of mem
Sound Blaster Live
40 Gig HD
Win 98
I've run 6 hour gigs, and not so much as even a hiccup from Atomixmp3!
I built a bigger and faster machine, but went back to the smaller one because it runs Atomixmp3 better.
Jim
AMD K6 500
128 Meg of mem
Sound Blaster Live
40 Gig HD
Win 98
I've run 6 hour gigs, and not so much as even a hiccup from Atomixmp3!
I built a bigger and faster machine, but went back to the smaller one because it runs Atomixmp3 better.
Jim
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 5:14 am
Tommy_2Tall
DJ Jim; I've tested the demo on a equivalent system and I experience some lag/clipping when for example drastically changing the pitch for one of the decks(the other one started chopping) and the same thing happend while "scanning" either track in the pos-bar or by dragging the beatgraph..
Did you experience any problems like that?
It worked like a charm when I didn't do those things though so it wasn't a big deal :)
Did you experience any problems like that?
It worked like a charm when I didn't do those things though so it wasn't a big deal :)
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 9:26 am
aknit44
A bit of the lagging problem has something to do with your processor spec, and the Atomix code itself. Some of my folders are really large, with over 5,000 songs, so opening them take quite a while. Atomix, itself, freezes during this period, which could last anywhere from 2 to 7 seconds, depening on the speed of your system, and the size of your drive.
At this point, sound is still playing. I am not sure, however, whether this is real time sound, or whether it's played from the sound card/software buffer. This is a vulnerable spot, because if you were at a party and the MC suddenly requested a change of song, which was on another one of your large drives, he'd have to wait 10 seconds for the folder to load, then another 5 for you to find the song, another 5 for you to load it, cue it and play it, which is way too long.
Good luck.
At this point, sound is still playing. I am not sure, however, whether this is real time sound, or whether it's played from the sound card/software buffer. This is a vulnerable spot, because if you were at a party and the MC suddenly requested a change of song, which was on another one of your large drives, he'd have to wait 10 seconds for the folder to load, then another 5 for you to find the song, another 5 for you to load it, cue it and play it, which is way too long.
Good luck.
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 12:38 pm
DJ Rick
use the search for specific songs... only takes less that a second or two.... depending on how fast you can type.
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 12:58 pm
Dj Morris
Sorry Phenryll But...
I made a party for people, and i try atomix on a p2 366 with 64 ram memory and it works very good (the only bad point is the "waves curves" who lag, but the sound was great and i don't have any probleme during 6 hours.
The Pc is a Dell Lattitude Cpi (notebook) with one sound card and 2 speakers and a leadphone)
I made a party for people, and i try atomix on a p2 366 with 64 ram memory and it works very good (the only bad point is the "waves curves" who lag, but the sound was great and i don't have any probleme during 6 hours.
The Pc is a Dell Lattitude Cpi (notebook) with one sound card and 2 speakers and a leadphone)
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 5:04 pm
Phenryll
Ok, thanks. And no lag problem?
geposted Tue 18 Jun 02 @ 5:33 pm
trip_likeido
It will run fine on a P2-300 with 64 ram, AS LONG AS there are no other programs running in the background, and running a "light" skin. Atomix 2.0 ran fine on mny PII 233 128 ram. (32 ram was hopeless). Ram is more important than CPU speed.
ALSO .... The NT engine makes better use of the system resources ... I have tried both win98 and 2000 .... atomix runs faster on 2000.
ALSO .... The NT engine makes better use of the system resources ... I have tried both win98 and 2000 .... atomix runs faster on 2000.
geposted Wed 19 Jun 02 @ 6:33 pm