nash
yes indeed .. better loops . i already post the loop bug on the bug section ..
but i am telling all the comunity too look by them selves
don you noticed a small jum when you set a loop lower than 1/2 ??? i mean it loops before its time to loop .. and that happends like 5 to 6 beats after then it come the glich
and algo .. when you dont set the loop right it gives pops .
but i am telling all the comunity too look by them selves
don you noticed a small jum when you set a loop lower than 1/2 ??? i mean it loops before its time to loop .. and that happends like 5 to 6 beats after then it come the glich
and algo .. when you dont set the loop right it gives pops .
geposted Sun 18 Apr 04 @ 6:25 am
djzero
i think that the loops need to be locked to the beat patten or corrispoding fractions depending on the size of the loop. currently you can start a loop anywhere between a beat when strictly i think that these should be beatmatched to the corrisponding beats, thi i think would also make them sound better as a whole
geposted Sun 18 Apr 04 @ 1:00 pm
digijoc-Mele
In my experience, the effectiveness of vDJ looping depends heavily on vDJ having a "good" BPM value for the track.
I have also in the past seen an inconsistency in the loop pattern after a few iterations or while downsizing the loop. I can't remember the details, but I think it was because of one of the FAME settings.... Try changing Beatlock to Rigid if you have it set to Elastic
I have also in the past seen an inconsistency in the loop pattern after a few iterations or while downsizing the loop. I can't remember the details, but I think it was because of one of the FAME settings.... Try changing Beatlock to Rigid if you have it set to Elastic
geposted Sun 18 Apr 04 @ 2:32 pm